Small bombs, rapid fire

Threads related to water balloon launchers.
User avatar
SSCBen
Posts: 6449
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:00 pm

Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Post by SSCBen » Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:23 am

Some sort of sabot is necessary to prevent the balloon from popping as far as I know, so yes.

Edit: I've been doing a little thinking, and I've come to the conclusion that water balloons can be launched much more efficiently with some sort of elastic system. Catapults can have efficiencies of 80% from what I understand--this is a huge advantage because I'd be struggling to get 30% efficiency with a pneumatic gun. I'm thinking something like a crossbow with a balloon clip could possibly be the ultimate water balloon gun.

This isn't to say that this project isn't going to be made. I've already ordered the parts and have nothing better to do. ;)
Last edited by SSCBen on Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Silence
Posts: 3825
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:01 pm

Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Post by Silence » Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:11 am

How far are you willing to stretch the elastic? That affects how close together the two ends can be. If they're far apart, then a lot of the tension in the elastic comes from the two posts pulling away from each other, and not from them pulling in the direction of the shot. That extra force then requires a stronger frame, etc.

Given how much the elastic stretches, and given how far back you'll stretch it, you should be able to find how far apart to put the posts.

User avatar
SSCBen
Posts: 6449
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:00 pm

Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Post by SSCBen » Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:45 pm

The loading shouldn't be too much of a problem. I intend to do tests to see how thick an elastic band is necessary and work from the minimum, so the forces will not be particularly high. And I can easily design a frame to support the load with minimum deflection and material. Taking a few solid mechanics classes help. A simple and cheap box beam of the correct dimensions should be more than adequate.

With that being said, I haven't decided how far to set the posts. I'll take a look at the force-deflection curves for latex tubing to get an idea of how much deflection is wanted. I can work from there.

Edit: Let me also say that while a crossbow will be more efficient than a pneumatic gun, that doesn't mean I won't work to improve the efficiency further. Relatively simple engineering like this is very satisfying.
Last edited by SSCBen on Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
cantab
Posts: 1492
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:35 pm

Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Post by cantab » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:16 pm

A catapult may be more efficient, but an air cannon will be more accurate.
I work on Windows. My toolbox is Linux.
Arsenal:
Super Soaker: XP215, 2xXP220, Liquidator, Aquashock Secret Strike M(odded), Arctic Blast M, CPS1200, CPS2100, SC Power Pak, 3l aquapack, 1.5l aquapack
Water Warriors: Jet, Sting Ray M, Shark, Argon M, Tiger Shark, PulseMaster
Others: Waterbolt, The Blaster, Storm 500, Shield Blaster 2000, generic PR gun, generic backpack piston pumper (broken), 3l garden sprayer M, 10l water carrier:

User avatar
SSCBen
Posts: 6449
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:00 pm

Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Post by SSCBen » Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:43 pm

Maybe my comment about the efficiency of a catapult was confusing. I'm considering crossbows and remember reading something about the efficiency of a catapult being really high. Crossbows shouldn't be too much less accurate than an air cannon, especially with guides.

User avatar
SSCBen
Posts: 6449
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:00 pm

Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Post by SSCBen » Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:38 pm

After some thought, I've decided to change the water balloon launcher I had in mind to a semi-automatic tennis ball launcher. The design probably won't be able to work as a WBL due to the fragility of water balloons, but it'll be interesting nonetheless.

User avatar
cantab
Posts: 1492
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:35 pm

Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Post by cantab » Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:05 am

Good luck with it!

Actually, a ping-pong-ball launcher would be cool too. You could use that in mock warfare safely.
I work on Windows. My toolbox is Linux.
Arsenal:
Super Soaker: XP215, 2xXP220, Liquidator, Aquashock Secret Strike M(odded), Arctic Blast M, CPS1200, CPS2100, SC Power Pak, 3l aquapack, 1.5l aquapack
Water Warriors: Jet, Sting Ray M, Shark, Argon M, Tiger Shark, PulseMaster
Others: Waterbolt, The Blaster, Storm 500, Shield Blaster 2000, generic PR gun, generic backpack piston pumper (broken), 3l garden sprayer M, 10l water carrier:

aEx155
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:13 am

Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Post by aEx155 » Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:07 pm

Ping-pong-balls can't fly past, what, 20 feet, right? I'm guessing that since they weigh practically nothing, their momentum will be reduced very quickly due to air resistance...

I wish this design would work with waterballoons, though, since it'd be nice to have something that shoots "friendly projectiles" (if one can say tat WBs are friendly...).

User avatar
SSCBen
Posts: 6449
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:00 pm

Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Post by SSCBen » Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:04 pm

The design I had in mind (I've put it off until next summer at the earliest) might be adaptable to water balloons with a solid sabot. I'll think about it. The design is very simple and much like my FANG Nerf gun if anyone wants to go try it.

Post Reply