Question about 2 Liter Homemade
- vaporizer28
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 1:47 pm
I think that you need to connect it to a hose to pressurize, but not to fire.
Detach the yellow attachment and attach the hose, pressurize, close valve, reattach yellow attachment.(attach attack!
I'm thinking about making a homemade gun sometime soon.
Detach the yellow attachment and attach the hose, pressurize, close valve, reattach yellow attachment.(attach attack!
I'm thinking about making a homemade gun sometime soon.
^This was made by Superstormer. What, do you think it got here on its own?
- SSCBen
- Posts: 6449
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:00 pm
Hmm... I thought I replied to this.
Well anyway, to explain, it only is pressurized by the hose. You'll need some sort of gardening attachment to fill the gun, this attachment should be available at a hardware store. After the pressurization is complete, you can remove the gun from the hose and use it elsewhere. If the gun was attached to the hose permanently then I wouldn't consider it much of a homemade and likely wouldn't make an article on it.
Well anyway, to explain, it only is pressurized by the hose. You'll need some sort of gardening attachment to fill the gun, this attachment should be available at a hardware store. After the pressurization is complete, you can remove the gun from the hose and use it elsewhere. If the gun was attached to the hose permanently then I wouldn't consider it much of a homemade and likely wouldn't make an article on it.
- SSCBen
- Posts: 6449
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:00 pm
Yes, pressurization after each shot is complete is required (if you intend to shoot again). That is why this gun is not the most battle-ready gun -- pressurization is somewhat complicated and can take more time compared to a normal QFD. If you like this design for whatever reason, with an old or broken QFD-based gun you can make this work off the QFD. I did! I took a Triple Shot tank and modified it so I could attach tubing to it. The actual tank part was removed and the inside tubing had another tube attached to it. I sadly do not have any pictures of this, though I doubt any would be needed.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 2:56 pm
Mine pressurizes in about 3 seconds, but I have very good pressure in my hose. Anyway when I built mine I added a 3/4" PVC "TA" (with threading) and here I've attached a 'quick disconnect no leak' gizmo. (Note it's in gardening and made of brass) You have one part of it on the spigot and the other on the gun. Just snap them together, it opens the valve and pressurizes. Anyway it's the homemade version of a qfd.
Sorry if this is unclear but it's rather hard to explain. On a side note the piece is used for quickly connecting and disconnecting device such as sprinklers and hose heads.
Sorry if this is unclear but it's rather hard to explain. On a side note the piece is used for quickly connecting and disconnecting device such as sprinklers and hose heads.
- SSCBen
- Posts: 6449
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:00 pm
I understand completely what you're talking about because I've seen those same parts and used some of them. However, I don't think everyone will understand just because they haven't seen those parts.
In homemade QFDs, I like using a 3/4" threaded female coupler with a few other parts to pressurized. Simple system, but I'm sure there's a better one.
This makes me think, has anyone made an actual homemade, SS-compatable QFD? Shouldn't be too hard and likely would outlast any normal QFD.
In homemade QFDs, I like using a 3/4" threaded female coupler with a few other parts to pressurized. Simple system, but I'm sure there's a better one.
This makes me think, has anyone made an actual homemade, SS-compatable QFD? Shouldn't be too hard and likely would outlast any normal QFD.
- SSCBen
- Posts: 6449
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:00 pm
Before I post this, let me warn you that adding extra characters to extend the length of your post is not allowed and that WAS WRITTEN ON THE PAGE THAT TELLS YOU YOUR POST IS TOO SHORT. I can't make it any more obvious and I get mad when people bypass that this way. If you've got a problem with this limitation, by all means, bring it up in the topic meant for it. Also, a spell check is provided and good grammar would be appreciated at least. I'm not trying to be mean, just trying to cut the XPBackfire-esque out of our forums.
A quick check of one of the glossaries of terms on our site would have returned what you were looking for. Remember, checking the site always is a great way to find what you're looking for.
Another rule of thumb: If you think a post is a inexperienced user one, don't post it. If you think that you're a inexperienced user, follow the rules and you won't be one. inexperienced users only are the ignorant and you won't be ignorant if you educate yourself.
A quick check of one of the glossaries of terms on our site would have returned what you were looking for. Remember, checking the site always is a great way to find what you're looking for.
Another rule of thumb: If you think a post is a inexperienced user one, don't post it. If you think that you're a inexperienced user, follow the rules and you won't be one. inexperienced users only are the ignorant and you won't be ignorant if you educate yourself.
- Soaker Leader
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:43 pm