Post your benchmark results, hints, etc here. NO SPOILERS WHATSOEVER! Although if you bought it when it came out you should have finished the game by now. (I've beat it twice)
My benchmark results: http://dan.sscentral.net/benchmark-results.html
Soon I will be upgrading to a 6600GT, then eventually another one. Full system specs:
Antec Super LanBoy Case
Antec 450w PSU
Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe
Athlon 64 3500+
512mb Kingston
120gb WD1200JB H/D
20gb Quantum Fireball Secondary H/D (soon I will be buying a 160gb Serial ATA drive)
XFX GeForce 6600 256mb (still cheaper than the GT with twice the video memory!
Plextor Premium 52/32/52 CD-RW
NEC ND-3500A 16x DVD+/-RW (+R(W) DL support as well)
The Ubiquitous Half-Life 2 Topic
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:31 pm
anycard below a radeon 9800XT or geforce 5950 Ultra with 256MB memory will be slower than the 128 MB counterpart because it uses slower memory. The 6800GT will still be quite a bit faster. And I bought it the day it came out, and I have barely played it. haven't beat the SP yet, playing css.
my benchmark score
system:
Athlon 64 3200+ Newcastly core, 2.2GHZ
1GB Mushkin PC3200
80GB 7200 RPM samsung SATA
radeon 9800 pro 128MB
my benchmark score
system:
Athlon 64 3200+ Newcastly core, 2.2GHZ
1GB Mushkin PC3200
80GB 7200 RPM samsung SATA
radeon 9800 pro 128MB
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:31 pm
ok here is the result when I did the same benchmark as you
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v392/ ... hmark2.jpg
I was using twice the amount of AA and AF btw
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v392/ ... hmark2.jpg
I was using twice the amount of AA and AF btw
- Neuro
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 12:00 pm
- Neuro
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 12:00 pm
- Soakologist
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:00 pm