Page 1 of 1

Cps 2700

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:26 am
by Captaing
Would you recommend the cps 2700? I have read the reviews that say it's heavy and weirdly shaped. All of this aside, is it worth the weight and the weird placement of things?

Thanks!

Re: Cps 2700

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:50 pm
by SEAL
I like mine. It's not too heavy for me, but for younger users, it may be a little bulky. It's more compact than say, a CPS 2500, but I don't think it has as much power. The main allure of the 2700 is it's massive reservoir; it lasts much longer than almost every other CPS blaster aside from the ones with backpack reservoirs (CPS 3000 and 3200.).

So if you think you're strong enough to use it well, then by all means, pick one up (Unless you can find something better for a similar price, like a CPS 1500/1700.). If you think it would be too heavy, then I'd recommend a CPS 1000, 1200, or 2100, all of which have almost as much power as a 2700, but in a much lighter package, and with only one nozzle.

Re: Cps 2700

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:18 pm
by atvan
The 2100 seems to have more punch behind it. Combined with the tracked pump and more compact design, I would recomend it.

The 2700 is too wide for me- it is hard to reach my arm around it.

Re: Cps 2700

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 3:08 am
by mr. dude
It's a very useful water gun, other than its capacity, I find that it has impressive power. I don't feel that it's underpowered for its size, at least not mine anyway.
It's versatile, scary, and effective. On the downside, yes, it's big and heavy, and there's a lot of potential for breakage.
Overall, I definitely recommend it.

Re: Cps 2700

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:26 pm
by atvan
If you do get it, you should probably reinforce the pump, which is long and bendy.