Go Back   Super Soaker Central > Water guns > General
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2004, 04:03 AM   #1
The dark ANNIHILATOR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 364
UserID: 53
Default

Blazer

Lengths= 24 inches

Pumps= 33

Shot Time:

3mm(4X)= 9 seconds

2.5mm= 13 seconds

2mm(2X)= 17 seconds

1.8mm= 23 seconds

1mm(1X)= 53 seconds


The Blazer Combines the power and stream of a CPS with the shot time and pumping style of an Airpressure soaker. As far as I am concerned, the "Diaphram Technology" is a step up to CPS technology. The pump is a new form of trackmpounted pump. It does take 33 pumps to fully pressurize, but its as easy and smooth like an XP pump. By the time a CPS pump pumped 1 time, the Blazer pumped 2-3 times. I consider the electronic pressure gauge unnecessary, but its still useful. You can take the batteries out if you wish, and the performance would not change. It has about the same length and colours as a CPS2100, making it seem like a twin from a parallel universe. The strap is fairly comfortable and also easy to remove, something which can not be said for other soakers.

The Blazer is quite capable to reach 40 feet, and you are actually able to pump while shooting,which a CPS can not do. All nozzles have an incredible shot time making even most XPs look bad. The 4 smaller nozzles have a drop off for about 0.5-1 seconds.Other than that, they are fairly constant. The largest nozzle does not have a drop off at all. I repeat, no drop off at all. The 10th second is a wet misty air shot showing that there still is pressure in the diaphram chambers after the water is gone.

The largest thick stream looks like a 5X stream. It is much larger than the 2.5X stream of the CPS2700. Power wise, the CPS2100 is a bit more powerful. But one has to remember that the PC of the CPS2100 was made for a 5X-7X soakage. The Blazer PC was made for a 4X soakage. If you would add another diaphram chamber, the Blazer would easily outpower the CPS2100. It is best to compare the Blazer with the SC600 which also has a small nozzle with CPS technology, showing that the Blazer has a lot more force and soakage than the SC600 and underlining the power and vast potential of diaphram technology.

The Blazer has the best of both CPS and Air Pressure worlds. And overall, Diaphram technology is a step up to CPS. For the first large generation 1 Blaster, Water Warriors did an extremely good job. One can only imagine what kind of performances future cannons could do with diaphram technology. Clearly the Blazer is the best water gun in stores in 2003 and 2004. It would not be wise to buy another soaker first than the Blazer this year.(Im not being payed by Buzz Bee toys. Im just saying what my impression is about the Blazer.) Also price wise the Blazer is a bargain. Its $19.99CAN in Canada, and $19.99US in USA. I got the Blazer for $19.95 CAN, which was about the same price as the SoakerTag model with the ridiculous disk on it, showing its an extremely good deal for Canadians. So if you can pick it up, pick it up.

[Edit April 28] Blazer Re-evaluation: Ihave compared the shot between the blazer with the CPS1500 5X nozzle. Also with the CPS1000 5X nozzle. I still like the stretched out shot time of the Blazer, but after a constant back and forward, I do miss the explosive power of the 98 CPS soakers. I guess I should not have compared the Blazer to the less powerful CPS2100. Anyways, I like the Blazer stretched out shot time, but when It comes down to it, I would still prefer a CPS1000 because of its power. In any case, Blazer is a good weapon and diaphram tech has a lot of potential to make really excellent powerful soakers.




Comparison shots: Blazer 4X, CPS2100 5X, CPS2700 2.5X:


__________________

The dark ANNIHILATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 04:59 PM   #2
Hyper_9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere in California
Posts: 313
UserID: 51
Default

Uber1337ness! Just add a overall rating (I didn't finsh reading through it yet) to the top, and Ill Xpress it to Neo, or Doom if I catch him one more time b4 he vanishes into the wilderness.
__________________
Offical DMOZ Editor of "Recreation: Guns: Toy: Water Guns"
Soak On
HYPERACTIVE 4 EVER!
Hyper_9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:10 PM   #3
BlueSmudge
Senior Member
 
BlueSmudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 886
UserID: 97
Default

looks o so good. I think ill look for one. Is it better than say a 1500 0r 1700?
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------

BlueSoak.net
--------------------------------------------------------------
BlueSmudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:17 PM   #4
Spinner
Administrator
 
Spinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,321
UserID: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by BlueSmudge@Apr 23 2004, 11:10 PM
Is it better than say a 1500 0r 1700?
I wouldn't say so (although I haven't used one), since the nozzle is less than 0.5 of the size of the 1700's largest nozzle.
__________________
ISS: Soaker Sagas

Submit your saga and see it up with other titans of water warfare.
Spinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:21 PM   #5
BlueSmudge
Senior Member
 
BlueSmudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 886
UserID: 97
Default

so if I had I choice of buying a 1500 or a blazer, I should get the 1500?
(real situation)
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------

BlueSoak.net
--------------------------------------------------------------
BlueSmudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:23 PM   #6
Spinner
Administrator
 
Spinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,321
UserID: 77
Default

Depends on the prices. B)
__________________
ISS: Soaker Sagas

Submit your saga and see it up with other titans of water warfare.
Spinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:26 PM   #7
BlueSmudge
Senior Member
 
BlueSmudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 886
UserID: 97
Default

They are about the same price actually. This guy I know will sell me a 1500 for like $25. The Blazer is that one on ebay. I only have enough $$$$$ for one of them. Suggestions?
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------

BlueSoak.net
--------------------------------------------------------------
BlueSmudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:27 PM   #8
The dark ANNIHILATOR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 364
UserID: 53
Default

Quote:
looks o so good. I think ill look for one. Is it better than say a 1500 0r 1700?

No. Its fairly equal in overal performance to the CPS2100. The power and soakage of the Blazer is a little less with 4X, but it has a greater distance and shot time. The CPS1500 has a 10X nozzle and has more force than a CPS2100. So its still better.
__________________

The dark ANNIHILATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:30 PM   #9
Spinner
Administrator
 
Spinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,321
UserID: 77
Default

I'd probably say the 1500, but I have a 1700 already, so I might be tempted by the Blazer. B)
__________________
ISS: Soaker Sagas

Submit your saga and see it up with other titans of water warfare.
Spinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:30 PM   #10
BlueSmudge
Senior Member
 
BlueSmudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 886
UserID: 97
Default

So the 1500 it is. Thanks-
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------

BlueSoak.net
--------------------------------------------------------------
BlueSmudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2004, 05:43 PM   #11
The dark ANNIHILATOR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 364
UserID: 53
Default

Blazer Re-evaluation: Ihave compared the shot between the blazer with the CPS1500 5X nozzle. Also with the CPS1000 5X nozzle. I still like the stretched out shot time of the Blazer, but after a constant back and forward, I do miss the explosive power of the 98 CPS soakers. I guess I should not have compared the Blazer to the less powerful CPS2100. Anyways, I like the Blazer stretched out shot time, but when It comes down to it, I would still prefer a CPS1000 because of its power. In any case, Blazer is a good weapon and diaphram tech has a lot of potential to make really excellent powerful soakers.
__________________

The dark ANNIHILATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2004, 06:22 PM   #12
BlueSmudge
Senior Member
 
BlueSmudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 886
UserID: 97
Default

if they could create a larger diaphram they could get a reall y cool, and powerful soaker!
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------

BlueSoak.net
--------------------------------------------------------------
BlueSmudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2004, 07:18 PM   #13
Ben
Founder
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,955
UserID: 1
Default

They can't create larger diaphram chambers, that's why they have multiple ones.

Don't think diaphram is anything superior BlueSmudge, it's only a different kind of CPS. The shot times come completely from the nozzle size. I could make a gun with a 1 inch thick CPS chamber that shoots for 2 minutes straight with a really tiny nozzle.

To those who remember, when I said that shot time is very important with Leftovers, I meant it. Now some more people are finally seeing it, while the Blazer does not get close to the 2.5 minute shot time of Leftovers, it still is good. Maybe that's why they put small nozzles on it.
__________________
email: ben at sscentral dot org / Forum rules

Read this page before emailing me.

Do not send me a PM or email with a question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums so others could offer their take.

Do not send me a PM or email about reading a certain post unless it's been a few days since you've posted. I try to read every post.
Ben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2004, 10:55 PM   #14
The dark ANNIHILATOR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 364
UserID: 53
Default

Quote:
Don't think diaphram is anything superior BlueSmudge, it's only a different kind of CPS.

Well, not every CPS chamber is the same. There is a reason why the MXL or the CPS2500 does not have a spherical CPS.
__________________

The dark ANNIHILATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2004, 11:47 PM   #15
cps41000x
Junior member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6
UserID: 87
Default

if it didn't have that electronic guage it would proboly be like 5-7$ cheaper personnaly I think the electronic guage is useless
cps41000x is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.2.2
Copyright ©2003 - 2008 The Super Soaker Central project