Go Back   Super Soaker Central > Technology and physics > Homemade water guns > Water balloon launchers
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-15-2008, 03:19 AM   #16
cantab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Posts: 434
UserID: 1400
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Is there any particular reason to use multiple barrels? In real guns (eg gatling guns) it's to avoid overheating issues, but WBL's don't have that.
__________________
Arsenal: 2x XP 220, Arctic Blast (broken), Aquashock Secret Strike (nozzle drilled), Sting Ray, Argon, Tiger Shark, Jet, Storm 500, Shield Blaster 2000, 3l garden sprayer, 1l sprayer, cheap PR gun, backpack piston pumper (broken, again), 3l aquapack, 1.5l aquapack, 10l water carrier.
cantab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 10:07 AM   #17
aEx155
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 280
UserID: 1517
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by cantab
Is there any particular reason to use multiple barrels? In real guns (eg gatling guns) it's to avoid overheating issues, but WBL's don't have that.

I think the sole reason to use multiple barrels is to lower the chance of popping balloons. Since the only time they move (in the barrel) is when they're loaded and when they're fired, that leaves very little chance of them breaking.

I'm thinking that you could have a team of 2 - 3 people, one (or two) loading a set of barrels and one firing. That would have the advantage of ROF while keeping balloons safe. Probably you could use some sort of breech system if you wanted to lose the multiple barrels, but that would reduce the ROF.
__________________
My homemade
aEx155 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 12:58 PM   #18
Ben
Founder
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,956
UserID: 1
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Multiple barrels are easy to make, relatively cheap, and don't pop balloons. They are also heavier and bulkier.

What I'm thinking of is something that can be held by one person rather than something operated by multiple. Range-wise it'd be able to shoot maybe 200 feet. I might add some simple iron sights to it too to improve accuracy.

Once I find my camera I'll post up a drawing of my concept...
__________________
email: ben at sscentral dot org / Forum rules

Read this page before emailing me.

Do not send me a PM or email with a question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums so others could offer their take.

Do not send me a PM or email about reading a certain post unless it's been a few days since you've posted. I try to read every post.
Ben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 09:16 AM   #19
Silence
Administrator
 
Silence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,244
UserID: 576
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

If you try designing a launcher or Nerf gun that uses magazines instead of multiple barrels, you'll find a brick wall when it comes to loading, creating a seal, and firing the balloons without popping them. Sabots don't help too much. Rotating barrels prevent parts from touching the balloons.
__________________
Forum Rules
Silence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 09:23 AM   #20
cantab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Posts: 434
UserID: 1400
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

There are stock Nerf guns that use magazines. Though of course Nerf darts don't pop.
__________________
Arsenal: 2x XP 220, Arctic Blast (broken), Aquashock Secret Strike (nozzle drilled), Sting Ray, Argon, Tiger Shark, Jet, Storm 500, Shield Blaster 2000, 3l garden sprayer, 1l sprayer, cheap PR gun, backpack piston pumper (broken, again), 3l aquapack, 1.5l aquapack, 10l water carrier.
cantab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 04:43 PM   #21
CROC
Senior Member
 
CROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada (GTA)
Posts: 276
UserID: 569
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Oh, but they do cantab, but they do. If enough air goes through a Nerf dart, the top will be forcefully removed from the gun, or the glue will magically wear out, and just the dart head will fly.
__________________
~CROC~(c 'rock)n.
-The master of ideas, and the occasional mod (Works with mr. dude)
Mods: 3xA combat - CPS Turbine - Super Flash Flood - (working on CPH)
CROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 04:59 PM   #22
cantab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Posts: 434
UserID: 1400
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Oh yeah...I've actually had that happen, though probably due to crappily glued darts rather than excessive power.
__________________
Arsenal: 2x XP 220, Arctic Blast (broken), Aquashock Secret Strike (nozzle drilled), Sting Ray, Argon, Tiger Shark, Jet, Storm 500, Shield Blaster 2000, 3l garden sprayer, 1l sprayer, cheap PR gun, backpack piston pumper (broken, again), 3l aquapack, 1.5l aquapack, 10l water carrier.
cantab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 10:43 AM   #23
Silence
Administrator
 
Silence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,244
UserID: 576
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Darts are also too soft in most cases. Many magazine-fed Nerf guns (both commercial and homemade) use complicated shells and ejection systems to make sure the darts aren't crushed. Without shells, you need long springs with low force constants and very tight tolerances.
__________________
Forum Rules
Silence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 09:21 PM   #24
aEx155
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 280
UserID: 1517
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

Kind of unrelated and related at the same time, but would using CO2 be acceptable here? It's not a water gun, and technically, since there's no chamber to fill (you could make it metal) you wouldn't have to worry about fracture.

Also, cantab's bit about multi-barrel guns having to cool down makes me thing that they would be able to "warm up" after firing, which would reduce the chance of breaking.

I know you could use HPA or bike-pumping really fast, but it was just an odd idea I though about.
__________________
My homemade
aEx155 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 09:53 PM   #25
Ben
Founder
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,956
UserID: 1
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

CO2 is a bad idea with plastic because the temperature makes the plastic brittle. It's also rather inconsistent unless you have very good equipment. I'd prefer HPA, especially given that they use the same threads and everything.

When I actually get around to making something like this it'll surely start off with PVC pipe but I'd love to get my hands on some CNC equipment and maching something... a simple WBL would be fine to start with.

Though, with CNC equipment I might be able to make a working bolt system, but I'd have to make parts fit together so that there's no seam, which might not be possible.

If I don't post a picture of my idea tomorrow, someone should send me an email to remind me...
__________________
email: ben at sscentral dot org / Forum rules

Read this page before emailing me.

Do not send me a PM or email with a question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums so others could offer their take.

Do not send me a PM or email about reading a certain post unless it's been a few days since you've posted. I try to read every post.
Ben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 11:22 AM   #26
Silence
Administrator
 
Silence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,244
UserID: 576
Default Re: Small bombs, rapid fire

HPA expands to maybe 10 to 200 times its compressed volume, depending on the pressure. Propane expands to around 300 times its original volume as a liquid. Carbon dioxide, about 850 times. So there are definite advantages to using liquid gas, plus the vapor pressures are lower than HPA. But vaporization is endothermic and can chill PVC even when deregulated.

Ben, if you *can* use metal for the entire launcher, then you could use propane or carbon dioxide instead and get a massive storage boost.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aEx
Also, cantab's bit about multi-barrel guns having to cool down makes me thing that they would be able to "warm up" after firing, which would reduce the chance of breaking.
You mean, letting the PVC warm up after being chilled by the passing air? That's probably not a very reliable mechanic and it's pretty risky, if you ask me.
__________________
Forum Rules
Silence is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.2.2
Copyright ©2003 - 2008 The Super Soaker Central project