| |||||||
| Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: England
Posts: 502
UserID: 1400 | Is there any particular reason to use multiple barrels? In real guns (eg gatling guns) it's to avoid overheating issues, but WBL's don't have that.
__________________ Arsenal: 2x XP 220, Arctic Blast (broken), Aquashock Secret Strike (nozzle drilled), CPS 2100, SC Power Pak, XP 215, Liquidator, Sting Ray, Argon, Tiger Shark, Shark, Jet, Storm 500, Shield Blaster 2000, Waterbolt, The Blaster, 3l garden sprayer, 1l sprayer, cheap PR gun, backpack piston pumper (broken, again), 3l aquapack, 1.5l aquapack, 10l water carrier. |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 305
UserID: 1517 | Quote:
I think the sole reason to use multiple barrels is to lower the chance of popping balloons. Since the only time they move (in the barrel) is when they're loaded and when they're fired, that leaves very little chance of them breaking. I'm thinking that you could have a team of 2 - 3 people, one (or two) loading a set of barrels and one firing. That would have the advantage of ROF while keeping balloons safe. Probably you could use some sort of breech system if you wanted to lose the multiple barrels, but that would reduce the ROF.
__________________ My homemade | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,016
UserID: 1 | Multiple barrels are easy to make, relatively cheap, and don't pop balloons. They are also heavier and bulkier. What I'm thinking of is something that can be held by one person rather than something operated by multiple. Range-wise it'd be able to shoot maybe 200 feet. I might add some simple iron sights to it too to improve accuracy. Once I find my camera I'll post up a drawing of my concept...
__________________ Note: I am busy so if I am slow to respond, be patient. email: ben at sscentral dot org / Forum rules / Read this page before emailing me. Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. Do not send me a PM or email about reading a certain post unless it's been a few days since you've posted. I try to read every post but do miss some. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Administrator Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,264
UserID: 576 | If you try designing a launcher or Nerf gun that uses magazines instead of multiple barrels, you'll find a brick wall when it comes to loading, creating a seal, and firing the balloons without popping them. Sabots don't help too much. Rotating barrels prevent parts from touching the balloons.
__________________ Forum Rules |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: England
Posts: 502
UserID: 1400 | There are stock Nerf guns that use magazines. Though of course Nerf darts don't pop.
__________________ Arsenal: 2x XP 220, Arctic Blast (broken), Aquashock Secret Strike (nozzle drilled), CPS 2100, SC Power Pak, XP 215, Liquidator, Sting Ray, Argon, Tiger Shark, Shark, Jet, Storm 500, Shield Blaster 2000, Waterbolt, The Blaster, 3l garden sprayer, 1l sprayer, cheap PR gun, backpack piston pumper (broken, again), 3l aquapack, 1.5l aquapack, 10l water carrier. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ontario, Canada (GTA)
Posts: 289
UserID: 569 | Oh, but they do cantab, but they do. If enough air goes through a Nerf dart, the top will be forcefully removed from the gun, or the glue will magically wear out, and just the dart head will fly.
__________________ ~CROC~(c 'rock)n. -The master of ideas, and the occasional mod (Works with mr. dude) Mods: 3xA combat - CPS Turbine - Super Flash Flood - (working on CPH) |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: England
Posts: 502
UserID: 1400 | Oh yeah...I've actually had that happen, though probably due to crappily glued darts rather than excessive power.
__________________ Arsenal: 2x XP 220, Arctic Blast (broken), Aquashock Secret Strike (nozzle drilled), CPS 2100, SC Power Pak, XP 215, Liquidator, Sting Ray, Argon, Tiger Shark, Shark, Jet, Storm 500, Shield Blaster 2000, Waterbolt, The Blaster, 3l garden sprayer, 1l sprayer, cheap PR gun, backpack piston pumper (broken, again), 3l aquapack, 1.5l aquapack, 10l water carrier. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Administrator Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,264
UserID: 576 | Darts are also too soft in most cases. Many magazine-fed Nerf guns (both commercial and homemade) use complicated shells and ejection systems to make sure the darts aren't crushed. Without shells, you need long springs with low force constants and very tight tolerances.
__________________ Forum Rules |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 305
UserID: 1517 | Kind of unrelated and related at the same time, but would using CO2 be acceptable here? It's not a water gun, and technically, since there's no chamber to fill (you could make it metal) you wouldn't have to worry about fracture. Also, cantab's bit about multi-barrel guns having to cool down makes me thing that they would be able to "warm up" after firing, which would reduce the chance of breaking. I know you could use HPA or bike-pumping really fast, but it was just an odd idea I though about.
__________________ My homemade |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,016
UserID: 1 | CO2 is a bad idea with plastic because the temperature makes the plastic brittle. It's also rather inconsistent unless you have very good equipment. I'd prefer HPA, especially given that they use the same threads and everything. When I actually get around to making something like this it'll surely start off with PVC pipe but I'd love to get my hands on some CNC equipment and maching something... a simple WBL would be fine to start with. Though, with CNC equipment I might be able to make a working bolt system, but I'd have to make parts fit together so that there's no seam, which might not be possible. If I don't post a picture of my idea tomorrow, someone should send me an email to remind me...
__________________ Note: I am busy so if I am slow to respond, be patient. email: ben at sscentral dot org / Forum rules / Read this page before emailing me. Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. Do not send me a PM or email about reading a certain post unless it's been a few days since you've posted. I try to read every post but do miss some. |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Administrator Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,264
UserID: 576 | HPA expands to maybe 10 to 200 times its compressed volume, depending on the pressure. Propane expands to around 300 times its original volume as a liquid. Carbon dioxide, about 850 times. So there are definite advantages to using liquid gas, plus the vapor pressures are lower than HPA. But vaporization is endothermic and can chill PVC even when deregulated. Ben, if you *can* use metal for the entire launcher, then you could use propane or carbon dioxide instead and get a massive storage boost. Quote:
__________________ Forum Rules | |
| | |