| |||||||
| Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 | |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | A week or two ago I was looking at our referrer logs when I noticed this: http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/forum...1&postcount=37 Quote:
That's much more specific than anything else I've heard. I'll be contacting this guy to learn more and see maybe if we could get something like a newspaper article.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. | |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Administrator Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,293
UserID: 576 | I'm in total agreement with you. Ugh. There may be some truth to that after all. I'm thinking it was at point-blank range, obviously to the face, but you never know.
__________________ Forum rules |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Hydro-copper Solutionist Join Date: May 2008 Location: Forest of Dean, UK
Posts: 67
UserID: 1581 | isnt that partly why they never made them that string again? i thought this is what happened originally, where someone took a shot to the face at point-blank range. This is science, if high-pressure water is pushed into the eye, the eye is forced out by the pressure. Im wondering how much stress this would place on the opticnerves, stretching to hold the eyeball?
__________________ ![]() Armoury includes: SS XP110, SS XP270, My Homemade Copper Gun, "Requiem" (with a Water Capacity of about 16 Litres and currently a PC Capacity of about 0.5 Litres). Range and weight currently unknown, but it does double as a portable refill station. Also, I'm a Militaristic Guerilla Intuitive, with just a hint of Techie. Maybe Physcologist as well? |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | Here's the message I sent to the guy: Quote:
All we can do now is wait for a response.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Administrator Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,293
UserID: 576 | Aurum, the problem was that there wasn't really any documentation of such an incident. It never made the news, nothing. The only claims were fictional stories from parents who were concerned with the power of some water guns. From what I know, even Wild Boys, an older member of Soakerdom, wrote up some account at some shopping website in a review of the CPS 3200, I believe. This incident actually has specifics and we have a potential way to verify the claim. That's big.
__________________ Forum rules |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | Quote:
When Super Soaker employees were asked why the CPS 2000 was discontinued, they said it was to sell the CPS 2500. I think it's more likely that the CPS 2000 was getting too expensive to manufacture with such a thick chamber so they toned it down a bit than safety concerns caused them to change their minds. Though with this in mind I could be wrong. I really highly doubt it would pop someone's eye out completely. The water would have to go behind the eye to dislodge it. The water would have to be shooting at the eye, which would push it in. The eye would push back too, but with equal force and not enough to push it out. That's why I never completely bought the eye popping part of the story. Partially popped out makes more sense to me. Most likely I think the stream hit on the side and that would get water behind the eye loosening it. That seems most likely.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: England
Posts: 539
UserID: 1400 | There must be records of people getting hit in the eye with things like fire hoses or pressure washers. That would give us an idea of what injuries could actually happen. Slightly related - was the 2500 (along with the 1500 and 3000) the first Super Soaker to feature a rotating nozzle selector? I certainly know of no XP with that feature. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | The SS 200 was the first with some sort of nozzle selector. I can't tell from the picture if it rotates but it does have some sort of nozzle selector. Some XPs had nozzle selectors too. The XP 250 and XP 310 are two that come to mind.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Maryland
Posts: 718
UserID: 320 | I hope this guy contacts Ben. It might verify where the story came from. The CPS 2500 wasn't the first, but was the first to have a nozzle selector with riot blast. The SS 200's nozzle selector was for the most part a gimmick because it didn't really change the output too much. But it was the first, released in 1991.
__________________ The Drenchenator, also known as Lt. Col. Drench. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | I got a reply back: Quote:
More waiting I guess, but it's good to know that he's looking into it.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | No new response. I'm going to send a new message tomorrow in case he forgot.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: England
Posts: 539
UserID: 1400 | I bet it'll turn out to be that his aunt didn't treat it or even see it, but heard it from one of her friends, and so on and so on. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Junior member Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 17
UserID: 1721 | Sorry for bumping a somewhat old thread, but, Ben, did you ever get any more responses back from him? |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | I never received another response. I'll send one again.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. |
| | |