| |||||||
| Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: England
Posts: 539
UserID: 1400 | I just had an interesting idea for the reservoir on a CPS-type gun. Use the OUTSIDE of the pressure chamber (ie between the latex tube and the surrounding case) as part of the reservoir. That thus makes use of what would otherwise be dead space, and fits more water in a more compact package. It'll basically give you the extra capacity you'd otherwise get by filling the PC then topping up the reservoir, but without having to carry the gun around pressurised. Of course if it's the only reservoir then it'll only hold one PC's worth of water, but I probably wouldn't make it the only one. One problem might be if the expanding bladder blocks the water intake. Another is if the latex doesn't like being wet all the time. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | That's a very interesting idea to save space. If done correctly so that there's no blockage, etc., there doesn't seem to be any disadvantages aside from it being a little weird. Someone should try it.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Maryland
Posts: 718
UserID: 320 | Unique idea! That would definitely save space, though sealing off the ends of the reservoir may be a bit difficult with piston seals or something. It's a bit odd, but I suppose that's because it's never been done before. Quote:
__________________ The Drenchenator, also known as Lt. Col. Drench. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 315
UserID: 1517 | So, as you pumped the water out, the water would go into the LRT? I was thinking that it might prevent the bladder from expanding, but if that's the case, then it sounds like a pretty cool idea.
__________________ My homemade |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Administrator Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,293
UserID: 576 | That's an interesting idea. In most PC cases, there's no seal between fittings, as the hose barbs do the sealing for you. I'm not sure whether you need solvent welded fittings and threaded fittings if you integrate a reservoir into the bladder's case, but you may not have to, since there's not really any pressure gradient for reservoirs. Reservoirs operate at the same pressure as the atmosphere.
__________________ Forum rules |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 315
UserID: 1517 | If the seal wasn't good enough, then water would leak out of the chamber, wouldn't it? You could file out the ridge in a reducer bushing and make the pipe that connects the barb to the rest of the gun go through, making a good seal. Like any other reservoir, though, you would have to have some way for air to enter/exit through to the PC case. What would happen if the PC case is sealed, and the bladder is shrinking?
__________________ My homemade |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: albuquerque (I live there and i still have trouble spelling it
Posts: 61
UserID: 1494 | interesting, but wouldn't the thickness of the PC add to the space taken up?
__________________ HASBRO stands for: Horrible, Atrocious, Stupid, Bratty, Rotten and Obnoxious |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | I'm thinking that if this was implemented correctly you could have a very powerful and very light water gun. I'm really liking the idea actually. I think I'll give it a try with some leftover parts. Quote:
Yes, the thickness of the PC would add to the space, but it's not much volume compared to the volume of the entire cylinder so it doesn't really make much of a difference.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: England
Posts: 539
UserID: 1400 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Somewhere
Posts: 279
UserID: 301 | Quote:
Having the reservoir around the CPS-chamber is what is done for the Water Warriors Hydra Pak/Aqua Pak. As long as air can get into the reservoir when the blaster is firing, there's no problem with the design. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Administrator Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,293
UserID: 576 | iSoaker: Now that I think about it, there's no other way to make the Hydra Pak have separate cases without a ton of bloat. Good example! ![]()
__________________ Forum rules |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Maryland
Posts: 718
UserID: 320 | Wow, I didn't think anyone made this yet. Good example, iSoaker! I guess the manufacturers are a few steps ahead in some areas.
__________________ The Drenchenator, also known as Lt. Col. Drench. |
| | |