| |||||||
| Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Junior member Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
UserID: 598 | So, after my Flash Flood recently died, I need a new gun fast. Right at the moment a local discounter is offering Super Soakers (apparently a re-issue of old ones) I can choose between a XP 275 and a Max-D 5000. Which one would you prefer? I know that both are not top-notch, but which one would you pick? elyz |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Maryland
Posts: 710
UserID: 320 | I would definitely choose the XXP 275. It performs better and has much more capacity than the Max-D 5000. The Max-D 5000 doesn't even have a separate pressure chamber; the one that you see if actually fake! The XXP 275 has two separate chambers and plenty of nozzles to choose from. In all, it doesn't really seem fair to compare the two.
__________________ The Drenchenator, also known as Lt. Col. Drench. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Junior member Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
UserID: 598 | Ooops, sorry I meant the XP 270. My fault .... *blush* So how about the XP 270 and Max-D 5000? elyz |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Maryland
Posts: 710
UserID: 320 | Again, definitely the XP 270. It has a separate chamber, which is very helpful are a sign of a quality gun. The Max-D 5000 has neither. Edit: Um, seems I was confused the XP 310 with the XP 270. Well, I'd still choose the XP 270 anyway.
__________________ The Drenchenator, also known as Lt. Col. Drench. Last edited by Drenchenator : 05-15-2008 at 08:49 AM. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,900
UserID: 1 | The XP 270 only has one nozzle from what I can tell. Still, I think it would be a better water gun because of the separate pressure chamber. From what I know it's the best selling Super Soaker of all time as well, so that's probably why it's still around.
__________________ email: ben at sscentral dot org Read this page before emailing me. Do not send me a PM or email when the question could be answered by someone else. Post at the forums to save time. Someone else could answer your question before me, and the discussion on your question could be very helpful. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: I live on ground.
Posts: 32
UserID: 1533 | XXP because most MAX-D's tend to break realy easly. So go with the XXP another reson is because you can proble still get a MAX-D 6000 i can get the 5000's in a town near mine. All i know is i dont think there going to be selling XXP 270's eny time soon.
__________________ Add me on xfire, "sneakiecookie" |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Administrator Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: UK
Posts: 1,317
UserID: 77 | Quote:
Let's set the record straight:
There is no XP 275 or XXP 270! The guns that elyz has requested feedback on are the XP 270 and the Max-D 5000. Finally, it I were in your position, elyz, I would opt for the XP 270. ![]()
__________________ ISS: Soaker Sagas Submit your saga and see it up with other titans of water warfare. | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Administrator Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,186
UserID: 576 | In my experience, the Max-D 5000 is way better than the XP 270. That said, the MD5K's trigger valve did break after maybe five years, and the XP 270 had a messed up nozzle that shot a very poor stream. The former's range was way better.
__________________ Forum Rules |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 61
UserID: 365 | I love the maxd5000, it has great power range and capacity for its size. |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |