| |||||||
| Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| View Poll Results: Which CPS bladder technology do you prefer: | |||
| Cylindrical | | 18 | 62.07% |
| Spherical | | 11 | 37.93% |
| Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: PA
Posts: 308
UserID: 110 | As many of us know there are 2 types of CPS technology: the more common Spherical and the more rare but rumored more powerful Cylindrical. Since my two favorite guns, the CPS 1000 and 1500/1700, are spherical I'd say I prefer Spherical. Also my CPS 1000 outperforms my CPS 4100 which is Cylindrical.
__________________ "Anything with a nozzle and a pump is good enough for me." <--------------- Same lying signature 3 years and counting! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Founder Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 6,054
UserID: 1 | I prefer and voted for cylindrical because I'm a big fan of homemade CPS chambers such as Latex rubber tubing. However, as far as modifying goes, I'd take a spherical chamber any day - the K-mod is far easier than Collosus. There isn't much if any actual performance-wise difference between either chamber as well.
__________________ email: Do not send me a PM or email with a water gun question if someone else could answer the question. Post at the forums. You will get a response from me along with others' views or ideas. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Wicked Super Admin Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Easton / New London, CT
Posts: 1,576
UserID: 75 | I voted for spherical because of modding. Balloons are easier to obtain than rubber tubing, and opening a spherical pc is easier than opening a cylindrical one. I've never made a CPH [although I'd like to]. Any CPH guides planned? I just need to know the cost of LRT plus the best way to attach it to the end of the pc.
__________________ Mess With the Best, Get Soaked Like the Rest!! 2004 Red Sox - World Series Champions 2007 RED SOX - WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS! 2003 Patriots - Super Bowl Champions 2004 Patriots - Super Bowl Champions 2007 Patriots - God Damnit! If I change my sig, will the world end? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Junior member Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 14
UserID: 634 | Spherical, they can be put on smaller guns but will keep power. Also, they're easier to shoot put 100% of the water in there. Last edited by SS_Stencil : 05-27-2006 at 01:49 PM. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Retired Moderator Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Canada
Posts: 832
UserID: 56 | I prefer spherical, like SS-Stencil said, you can fit it into a much smaller blaster and have a lot of power. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Back from the dead. Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: bay area, CA
Posts: 399
UserID: 345 | I voted cylindrical because of the potential...all of the more powerful CPS homemades and such use cylindrical. Although, I agree that spherical is very close performance wise. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Pittsburgh PA USA
Posts: 61
UserID: 664 | Cylintrical for being more powerfull (My cps 3000) I will agree the modding is difficult though.
__________________ You can get more with a kind word and a gun than just a kind word. I trade mobility for firepower. Accuracy for strengh. And Stealth for Intimidation. |
| | |