|
Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
UserID: 1723
|
![]() I've been going over the handle pump designs, and there all based on the Super Soaker hand pump which goes in/out simple effective but very tiring on the arm if u have a large resevoir, (i like back pack tanks, more on tap ammo) so have been on and off looking into a crank handle pump where all i do is turn a handle and it does the pumping easily and effectively.
I dont know if anyone has tried this, but feedback would be greatly appreciated Celcius1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 451
UserID: 2462
|
![]() Not again…
The reason that SS used the piston pump is because it is cheapest, most reliable, and easy for smaller people because they don't have to pump it all the way. Crank pumps, no matter what the type, have problems, be it volume, mechanical (dis)advantage, or fragility. Also, we would love if you searched for previous topics before posting one. There was a post on thie a few weeks ago here, detailing why it would not work. Don't feel too bad because I don't think that "crank" was used in that discussion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Retired Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 320
UserID: 47
|
![]() I'm pretty sure that someone could build a homemade crank pump that would work very effectively. The reason why they are not used in mass produced water blasters is because they are require lots of little parts, are asymmetric, and can break rather easily.
I'm intrigued to see someone build one though, on paper it seems pretty straight forward!
__________________
Join the fight! Support water warfare in your area today! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 48
UserID: 2533
|
![]() I've done some research on the topic myself on this option and atvam is right
Volume is usually poor and the cranking feels awkward unless on a turret or slung in some way. handles usually are too fragile. you can check my posts on the different pumps i researched on my profile
__________________
My Very First Mod and Gun - The $5 Dollar QFD Backpack Mod |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,492
UserID: 1400
|
![]() I've test-fired a Shield Blaster, which you crank the pump to shoot. Range and output aren't too bad, but the cranking action throws your aim off. With a standard piston pump, your pumping force is more or less along the firing axis, reducing impact on aiming while pumping.
__________________
I work on Windows. My toolbox is Linux. Arsenal: Super Soaker: XP215, 2xXP220, Liquidator, Aquashock Secret Strike M(odded), Arctic Blast M, CPS1200, CPS2100, SC Power Pak, 3l aquapack, 1.5l aquapack Water Warriors: Jet, Sting Ray M, Shark, Argon M, Tiger Shark, PulseMaster Others: Waterbolt, The Blaster, Storm 500, Shield Blaster 2000, generic PR gun, generic backpack piston pumper (broken), 3l garden sprayer M, 10l water carrier: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crater 5, Moon
Posts: 683
UserID: 1825
|
![]() I own a shield blaster, and I second all of what cantab said. I have to add that the stream is entirely dependant on whether or not you can get a smooth motion going, where you accelerate on the parts where you arent pumping water to keep a smooth stream. Not worth the time to make a homemade one.
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. Quack damn you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|