|
Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crater 5, Moon
Posts: 683
UserID: 1825
|
![]() @GJ That was some epic wisdom, and I fully agree with you.
On the other side of things, if the CO2 pump turns out to fail you could always repurpose it into an air gun. ![]()
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. Quack damn you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
A Shrouded Figure
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Easton / New London, CT
Posts: 1,780
UserID: 75
|
![]() I don't know if I'd put 150 PSI into a stock reservoir. They aren't exactly the strongest things, I mean some of them will implode a bit from neg pressure if you cut off all the air intake from the cap and then go to pump. I don't even put 150 into Douchenator and that's meant to take high pressure.
__________________
Mess With the Best, Get Soaked Like the Rest! 2004 Red Sox - World Series Champions 2007 Red Sox - World Series Champions! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
merc
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: milnor nd
Posts: 34
UserID: 2487
|
![]() theoretically, you could make a new tank that you could pressure rate if you mold one. you could make a mold of the origonal tank out of plastic, after you remove the pump and the o-ring; just split the mold down the middle, then think of how thick you want the plastic to be. you could also ,theoreticaly, make a new resivwar that is longer, and curved slightly, for a larger resivwar.
__________________
Why the f*** dose it seem like i'm the only one in north dakota on this site. if you live in sargent countty send me a message. squad of 3 beats an army of one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
A Shrouded Figure
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Easton / New London, CT
Posts: 1,780
UserID: 75
|
![]() Of course, if you have the ability to mold reservoirs, you can generate your own manufactured water gun and this discussion would be moot.
__________________
Mess With the Best, Get Soaked Like the Rest! 2004 Red Sox - World Series Champions 2007 Red Sox - World Series Champions! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MI, US
Posts: 1,502
UserID: 809
|
![]() Quote:
The main limiter here is cost. However, if you do have the money to go for HPA and/or good automatic pumps, then you want to do the job right which means you wouldn't use a stock water gun to do so which is not designed to take high pressure (the reservoirs are so obviously not designed for that) and which aren't designed to operate with anything other than traditional pumping. Whether pumping makes a good part of water warfare or not is completely irrelevant. Manual pumping exists because of practicality and cost issues, and if you want to avoid having to pump, you can build something that avoids it so long as the job is done right; safely and efficiently. Pressurizing a water reservoir (especially one that's not even designed to hold pressure at all) so that it automatically powers up the PC has got to be one of the stupidest water gun ideas I've ever heard of. It completely defeats the purpose of a PC in the first place. In the end, there are many, much better solutions if you really don't like pumping. HPA and auto pumps need to be used appropriately, but you can also use hoses and rely on pre-pressurization. You could have switchable PC's even, each being pre-pressurized, or you can build water guns with very large PC's and no reservoir that run off of hose pressure. In the end, it all comes down to cost.
__________________
HydroBrawl Water Warfare |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crater 5, Moon
Posts: 683
UserID: 1825
|
![]() I didn't think that he was going to put pressure in the reservoir. He was going to use the CO2 to drive a hydraulic piston, which would pump the gun for him. (At least from what I understand.)
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. Quack damn you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
A Shrouded Figure
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Easton / New London, CT
Posts: 1,780
UserID: 75
|
![]() Quote:
Doesn't sound like a piston to me. You couldn't use one in a stock 2500 reservoir anyway, I mean think about that shape...you'd need to replace the res with something that a piston can seal with.
__________________
Mess With the Best, Get Soaked Like the Rest! 2004 Red Sox - World Series Champions 2007 Red Sox - World Series Champions! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crater 5, Moon
Posts: 683
UserID: 1825
|
![]() I meant a piston to replace the hand motion of the pumping process. It would be automated instead of having to pump by hand.
Guess I was wrong about what he was trying to accomplish though.
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. Quack damn you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Junior member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
UserID: 2536
|
![]() Yup, me and -G-JiV- basically had the same idea. I am surprised to see that this topic is still front page. C-A_99 made a good point which was 100% correct. Here's what happened in the past 2 months.
I actually completed the project. Built the gun, attached the CO2 system and tested it. Filled the reservoir and PC with 40psi CO2 just fine, and it shot just like a normal CPS2500 except without the pumping (basically the exact same thing as GJiV did except I modified the tank instead of the checkvalve. Here's a picture of the final gun: ![]() Anyway, I went to the event where we were going to mess around with it, and we decided to "TURN IT UP TO MAX DUDE, let's see how much damage it can do to that barrel over there!" So I turned up the regulator pressure to max (125psi) and let loose. It worked well for the first 10 seconds and then it literally exploded when I released the trigger. Put a nice dent in an empty plastic barrel... but almost every internal component in the gun was ruined. I will post pics of the innards once I finish sorting the mess out. The tank, external checkvalve and nozzle held up though. Moral of the story: CO2 pressurized water gun - not a bad idea. Not great, but if nothing else, makes for a badass looking gun. Over-pressurizing your chamber to show off - retarded and costly mistake. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Combat Engineer
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NE England
Posts: 38
UserID: 2568
|
![]() ![]() It seems that what you made was actually a kind of CAP modded CPS 2500. Yes the pressurised water still fills the CPS bladder, but when you open the trigger the water will fill the bladder as you empty it with the same pressure the bladder exerts on the water leaving the blaster (if not even more). Therefore, for those ten seconds, the CPS bladder was not providing all of the power, it was partly the water pressurised at 125psi from the reservoir. Therefore it is a PR CAP mod (kinda)! But when the reservoir itself is pressurised, surely there's no need for a separate PC (other than for making a blaster which instills fear into others! ![]() You would probably have got better results if the regulated CO2 pressurised reservoir was connected directly to the trigger valve, by means of a larger diameter pipe (1/2"-3/4"?), making a portable CAP modded blaster (because a CAP blaster is essentially a PR blaster which keeps the air pressure constant!). Using a small CO2 canister and regulator for a homemade CAP project may, however, be a good (and smaller / cheaper) alternative to a large backpack CAP design. I may look into this sort of design for future projects.
__________________
The Revolution Will NOT Be Dry! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MI, US
Posts: 1,502
UserID: 809
|
![]() Perhaps calling it the stupidest idea I've ever heard was too mean, but it does defeat the whole purpose of the CPS 2500's design. You're putting something capable of so much more on something capable of so much less really, and maxing out the pressure would have rather predictable results.
__________________
HydroBrawl Water Warfare |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Austria's best gunner and > Europe's best seller <
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Austria
Posts: 350
UserID: 2281
|
![]() What a funny thing
![]() ![]() Well, you must not put in too much pressure, as all this is not ready to handle this... haha at least my gun does not have any damage from trying out this mod ![]() At least it brough some new thoughts to my mind ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Also I am planing to take my WW Vanquisher and combine it with the new WW Ultimate Vanquisher to get 5 nozzles in original design ![]() Did anyone ever test wheather they do have the same internals and they can be interchanged ??? Further, I am looking for a WW PULSE MASTER and/or WW PULSE STRIKE. I am willing to pay much for these guns, so if there is anyone ready to sell, please just contact me!!! Well, much work for my study...but there is some free time which I will put in in my hobby, super soakers! haha Still working on a concept to beat the SuperCannon2 ![]()
__________________
A gunner has to do what his Soaker requires... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|