CPSC-97 Voting
- chaosfox97
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:11 pm
CPSC-97 Voting
Hello, I just recently joined the forum but I have been looking at this website for a while. After looking at several plans I decided to make a CPS gun with a cylindrical pressure chamber. But instead of having a pressure chamber had an opening on only one end, I decided to design it with both ends, but I am also going to design one with a single end on the pressure chamber, and see which is best, according to you, the members of Super Soaker Central. I'm going to call it the CPSC-97; which stands for Constant Pressure System: Custom. I made these with PVC Design, a program someone made and posted a download link on this forum.
This is the Mark I version (with double ended chamber):
This is the Mark II version (with single end chamber):
And this is the backpack tank that can be attach to the right part of the tee connected to the reservoir:
Vote with the poll above for the one that is your favorite or the one you think is the best. This poll will be active for 28 days, beginning on 7/28/2010
This is the Mark I version (with double ended chamber):
This is the Mark II version (with single end chamber):
And this is the backpack tank that can be attach to the right part of the tee connected to the reservoir:
Vote with the poll above for the one that is your favorite or the one you think is the best. This poll will be active for 28 days, beginning on 7/28/2010
-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 7:09 pm
Re: CPSC-97 Voting
On the MkII you might need to make the PC case wider, because LRT expands 8x in width
I'm a dude
- Silence
- Posts: 3825
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:01 pm
Re: CPSC-97 Voting
I hope none of those proportions are final. In the Mark 1, the bladder's case needs to be twice as long, or the entire thing much shorter. By the looks of it, the current length wouldn't even let you reach the trigger valve when the bladder is full!
- chaosfox97
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:11 pm
Re: CPSC-97 Voting
Nope, mainly due to program limitations, I think it's a good rough model though...
- mysterio
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:18 pm
Re: CPSC-97 Voting
2 needs another check valve next to the tee/ball valve area
- zeda.beta
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 10:49 pm
Re: CPSC-97 Voting
No mysterio, because the T that appears to connect to that pipe is just sliding over, and is only there to stabilize the pump.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
Quack damn you.
Quack damn you.
- mysterio
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:18 pm
Re: CPSC-97 Voting
i meant the T thats right next to the ball valve, next to the PC. heres pic of what i mean
- zeda.beta
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 10:49 pm
Re: CPSC-97 Voting
Nah, he can have wasted space, because it won't affect pressure as much as you would think. And if he wanted to, he could move the second check valve to just below the PC/nozzle assembly.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
Quack damn you.
Quack damn you.