Go Back   Super Soaker Central > Water guns > General
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the SSC Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Important note: The SSC forums are now in archive mode. WaterWar.net is the new online discussion board for the water gun hobby.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2007, 03:55 PM   #1
The Stealthy Panda
Senior Member
 
The Stealthy Panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northampton
Posts: 88
UserID: 1033
Default Requesting input on the XXP 175

I got an XXP 175 off eBay about 10 or 20 minutes ago. I read on aqua nexus(good website for reviews of SS up to 2003, to find it just google "aqua nexus", doesn't have it's own domain name) that it was a great gun with a shot time of, like, 10 seconds. Now that I've spent my free birthday money on it, I would like input from XXP 175 owners on this maybe awesome blaster.
The Stealthy Panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 04:45 AM   #2
Spinner
Administrator
 
Spinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,337
UserID: 77
Default

It's a decent gun. Soakage is reasonable for its size, and it's quite fun to have dual streams. The main downside is that's it's only PR technology, and so isn't quite as powerful as it could have been. I don't use mine that much, but I'd still say it's a gun worth having.
__________________
ISS: Soaker Sagas

Submit your saga and see it up with other titans of water warfare.
Spinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 02:23 PM   #3
C-A_99
Administrator
 
C-A_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MI, US
Posts: 1,502
UserID: 809
Default

I think my brother had one of these once (he had one with 2 threaded reservoirs, and the XXP 175 is the only gun I know of that has those). With that said, 2 threaded reservoirs sure sounds like a pain to refill (as if one wasn't bad enough). One large reservoir with a cap is much better than 2 smaller ones that you have to unthread. Also, 1 large stream is better than 2 smaller streams.
__________________
HydroBrawl Water Warfare
C-A_99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 10:24 AM   #4
Spinner
Administrator
 
Spinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,337
UserID: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C-A_99
Also, 1 large stream is better than 2 smaller streams.

Not necessarily. In some situations, the wider spread of two streams might prove more useful than the spread of a single large stream.
__________________
ISS: Soaker Sagas

Submit your saga and see it up with other titans of water warfare.
Spinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 12:51 PM   #5
The Stealthy Panda
Senior Member
 
The Stealthy Panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northampton
Posts: 88
UserID: 1033
Default

That's what I was thinking. Like in base defense. But it would be twice as bad if you got shot in the eye.
__________________
Hail Reeen! (Reeen is not a typo)
The Stealthy Panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 03:46 PM   #6
Silence
Administrator
 
Silence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cville, VA / Urbana, IL
Posts: 3,825
UserID: 576
Default

In terms of targeting, multiple streams can be useful in rare cases if you're good at aiming at multiple targets, including leading with two streams. However, from most other perspectives, a single larger gun is going to be more powerful and more useful, and a single larger stream is going to have more range.

EDIT: Regarding multiple nozzles like on the XXPs, I don't really know. I'd guess the streams wouldn't have as much range as a single larger stream, and you can't aim at multiple targets. But I think there's a cap for closing off one nozzle.
__________________
Forum rules
Silence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 06:58 PM   #7
The Stealthy Panda
Senior Member
 
The Stealthy Panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northampton
Posts: 88
UserID: 1033
Default

Well, I got it, and it's not the bombshell I was hoping for. One stream is significantly more turbulent than the other, and the soakability leaves much to be desired, although that can be remedied with a nozzle drilling, because the shot times are so long. I'll try to get a review up, as well as some pictures. I'll post again when I've finished modifying.
__________________
Hail Reeen! (Reeen is not a typo)
The Stealthy Panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2003 - 2011 The Super Soaker Central project